Andy Surkis (Andy Serkis) is mainly known thanks to his computer characters: be it Gollum in "The Lord of the Rings" And "Hobbit", Caesar in "Planet of monkeys", Snuck in the last episodes "Star Wars", King Cong in the same tape of 2005 or a couple of games heroes Ninja Theory. But soon Surkis will be able to prove his viability as a director of a blockbuster: he prepares a tape "Mowgli".
How loudly declared in the first trailer, a new film Surkisa – The most gloomy retelling of all your favorite literary classics. So far, there are no cardinal discrepancies with the primary source in the film: Mowgli grew up in the jungle of India in the flock of wolves, followed by a bear Bala and Panther Bagira. Almost all animals take the boy except the terrifying tiger Sherkhan.
"Mowgli" He boasts of an impressive cast: Christian Bale (Christian Bale) plays Bagira, Kate Blanchett (Cate Blanchett) – Python KAA, Benedict Cumberbatch (BeneDict Cumberbatch) – Sherkhan, and himself Surkis will embody the ball on the screen. In addition, the film will appear in the film Eddie Marsan (Eddie Marsan), Naomi Harris (Naomie Harris), Peter Mullan (Peter mullan), Jack Reinor (Jack Reynor), Matthew Reese (Matthew Rhys) and Frida Pinto (Freida Pinto). The role of Mowgli will play the 14-year Rohen Chand (Rohan Chand).
Do not confuse "Mowgli" And "The Book of the Jungle" 2016. They are similar in concept and repel from one work, however "The Book of the Jungle" I studied Disney, A "Mowgli" Produced with support Warner Bros.
"Mowgli" should go to Russian rental on October 18, 2018.
May 21, 2018 The prize fund of the first season of Fortnite competitions will be $ 100 million
May 22, 2018 at https://casinosnogamstop.co.uk/ the new screenshot of Death Stranding, everything has grown in moss
The best comments
And you won’t argue, from human faces, instead of the muzzle of animals, it becomes somehow uncomfortable) In the jungle book, animals were alike at least animals. And what kind of artist Chois is it be sure to make a KAA girl?
Mowgli already becomes like a Batman or Spider-Man, and two years have not passed since the release of one film adaptation-they have already released the second.
The graphon is not so impressive, but the plot and visual style are much more interesting. In addition, the Disney version has a very strange tone of the story-either a child, then an adult, then completely incomprehensible, for some reason rolls into a musical where it is not necessary and inappropriate. There is clearly no problems with this.
We need a zimmer sir. – But this is a film about a boy and jungle … Call a zimmer here. And add bats. So. so that there was x)
And for me a very strange solution. I reminded how two films of attacks on the White House were published in almost one year: the White House storm and the fall of Olympus. It seems that different films and the presentation are somewhat different, but the plot and general ideas are the same. And a little strange seemed such a decision to proceed almost two identical films in one year. Now this.
I liked the Book of the Jungle Favro, especially since I watched the cartoon as a child. Now, in fact, the same thing is only darker. Serkis made a quite good film "Breathe for us". It seems even his directorial debut was. And in general, talent rushes in a person. But here it is somehow incomprehensible. In memory, a fresh jungle book, eminent actors are lost on dubbing, again the formation of Mowgli and confrontation with Sherkhan?! Well, I don’t know. While the film is a dark horse for me.
Well, when Bagir was turned into a female in the old Soviet cartoon, it didn’t bother anyone. I think they are more likely to be selected by the character of the character in the film.
Disney filmed his cartoon, and even in some points almost. It didn’t seem like that personally. Here is the greatest showman with songs every 10 minutes is really a musical, but here there are two songs for the whole cartoon. Although I don’t remember exactly. I did not completely look at the cartoon itself, but those moments that I saw did not catch. The film looked very easily and an episode with a song on the stomach Bala (almost completely “quoted” from the cartoon) is probably the most cool and memorable.
P.S. Someone was replaced by a minusometer. But express what is wrong – do not be able to? In general, it was high time to remove Stopheim at least the disadvantages (I didn’t like the comment – passed by analogy with likes in VK, Instagram* and T.D. ) and add posts already.
* The activities of the parent organization META are recognized as extremist and prohibited in the Russian Federation
Vladislav was very powerful and knew how to turn into different animals. Only he did not always get faces.
Bagira is a name, not a "female word". It was that in Soviet times, in a multinational country, where not only Ivanes and Olga on the streets met. He is Pantra Bagira. Only the nearby would be indignant or twisted the entire film, the rest would have accepted already in the second minute of the film, who not immediately.
Regarding animals, in particular wolves, the image of steam locomotives with faces immediately surfaced. And not chagiton (or what’s there?), and others are square with gray faces. It shrugged. According to the KAA, it is also in solidarity- In the primary source it is he. But the old cobra in an abandoned temple, guarding the treasures, where KAA brought Mowgli (having re -read it and pulls to ask: who brought whom to whom? :)) – there she.
It was not embarrassed and not embarrassed because, whatever one may say, but on our 100% Bagire – she is mine, t.e. Female clan. And you can’t get away from this anywhere. While KAA – he is mine/she is mine, t.e. Not definitely. Like most of the names ending on -o and th.
And in the English CAA of an indefinite kind, like most names and surnames. However, in the original it is he.
If we cannot do anything with Bagira, then they do not justify them on her side.
There was a dubious decision with Bagira, given the country’s multinationality (and, consequently, the diversity of names) and the official propaganda of the “friendship of peoples”. The viewer would easily “ate” the features of a foreign name of a foreign character. So it was the same “I see” as a result of cockroaches in my head, only these cockroaches are slightly more common.